Kaduna Court Orders Media Firm To Pay El-Rufai N10m For Defamation

Forum 2 years ago

Kaduna Court Orders Media Firm To Pay El-Rufai N10m For Defamation

A High Court in Kaduna State has ordered Today Publishing Company, publishers of The Union newspaper, to tender an apology and pay N10 million for defaming the state Governor, Nasir El-Rufai.

Governor El-Rufai had approached the court in 2015 after the newspaper published false claims about his assets declaration, in suit number KAD/KDH/285/15, which had Today’s Publishing Company Ltd as a defendant.

Delivering judgement on Monday, the presiding judge, Justice M.L. Muhammed of the Kaduna State High Court, ordered the defendants to pay El-Rufai the sum of N10 million as general damages and tender an apology which must be published in two national dailies.

The court held that the plaintiff had clinically demonstrated through his pleadings and evidence led in support that he never declared assets worth N90 billion and 40 mansions.

The court reiterated the ingredients that the plaintiff had proven the ingredients of defamation to wit: publication of the offending words; that the words refer to the plaintiff; that the words are defamatory of the plaintiff; that the words were published to third parties; that the words are false; and that there are no justifiable legal grounds for the said publication.

The court held that by Exhibits 1 and 2 (the print and electronic versions of the said publication), the plaintiff had shown that indeed the offending material was published by the defendants to third parties.

The court also held that by Exhibit 11 (the plaintiff’s assets’ declaration form submitted to the CCB), the plaintiff had satisfactorily shown that he did not declare assets worth N90bn and 40 mansions, the implication of which is that the words were false and defamatory of the plaintiff.

Similarly, the court noted that the first defence witness concluded his testimony by admitting that there was no basis for the said publication.

The court further referred to the testimony of the first defence witness which was replete with admissions and held that the defendants had failed to prove the defences of justification, fair comment and qualified privilege.

The court also perpetually restrained the defendants from further defaming Governor El-Rufai.